Home _ clj law _ clj

Emails sent to you weekly with the latest updates on the law.

DIRECTOR OF FOREST, SARAWAK & ANOR v. Health insurance explained TR SANDAH TABAU & ORS AND OTHER APPEALS [2017] 3 CLJ 1

MD RAUS SHARIF PCA, ABDULL HAMID EMBONG FCJ, AHMAD MAAROP FCJ, ZAINUN ALI FCJ,

[CIVIL APPEALS NO: 01-27-04-2015(Q), 01-30-04-2015(Q) & 01-42-04-2015(Q)]

NATIVE LAW AND CUSTOM: Land dispute – Customary rights over land – Codification of rights – Whether customary rights recognised under written laws by virtue of art. Primary health care course 160 of Federal Constitution – Whether rights protected under native custom – Pre-existence of rights under native laws and customs – Whether claim for native customary rights supported by evidence – Whether rights of natives confined to area where they settled and not where they foraged for food – Iban customs of pemakai menoa and establishments of pulau – Whether enabled natives to claim native customary rights over land – Whether activities on land considered – Superintendent of Lands and Surveys, Bintulu v. Primary health care ltd Nor Anak Nyawai & Ors And Another Appeal

WORDS & PHRASES: `having the force of law’ – Federal Constitution, art. Health insurance for unemployed 160(2) – Native customary rights – Claim for – Whether custom or usage fell within definition of law – Whether customary rights recognised under written laws – Whether existing customs have force of law

Uber rape case: Cab driver Shiv Kumar Yadav found guilty, faces life imprisonment

More than 10 months after a 25-year-old woman was raped and sexually assaulted inside a radio taxi in the national capital, a fast-track court in Delhi Tuesday convicted cab driver Shiv Kumar Yadav, holding him guilty on charges of rape and endangering the life of the victim. Cheap health insurance michigan Yadav, a former driver of Uber taxi service, faces a maximum punishment of life imprisonment.

Crocodile International wins Supreme Court fight against rival Lacoste

Last week was an exciting week in the trade mark world, as the Supreme Court released its latest decision in a long standing dispute between Crocodile International and Lacoste. Primary journal Supreme Court decisions on trade mark law are very rare, and this decision was especially welcomed as a clarification on the law on non-use of trade marks in New Zealand.


The case related to the question of whether Lacoste had used its trade mark registration (the crocodile mark). Health insurance waiting period Lacoste owned this mark as a result of an assignment to it from a Crocodile company many years ago. Health insurance rules Lacoste had never used the trade mark in this form, and had never used any trade mark including the word crocodile.

Matters to which court will have regard in determining whether manipulation has occurred

The High Court (Court) decision in Financial Markets Authority v Warminger is being read with interest by capital market participants as the first case on market manipulation decided in New Zealand.

The Court found that Mr Warminger acted in a way that gave or was likely to give a false appearance of trading in 2 of 10 claims made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA).

Market manipulation through trading (as opposed to where false or misleading information is disseminated about a security so that a trader can take advantage of an artificially high or low price) can take many forms, including trading where there is no change in beneficial ownership, placing contemporaneous buy and sell orders to create a misleading appearance of trading (matched orders or wash sales), marking the close by trading at close of the market to affect the price, or repeatedly buying at a higher price to induce others to bid more (upticking).

Judgement, “not passion should prevail”. Women’s health specialists of dallas Justice Athar Minallah of the Islamabad High Court has delivered a landmark judgement – BNP Pvt Ltd., v Capital Development Authority. Home health care companies The case involves One Constitution Avenue – an upscale, high-rise, twin-tower real-estate development – in which the entire who’s who, the elitist-of-the-elite of Islamabad own at least one apartment.

In the 12,832-word judgement the word ‘authority’ appears 147 times, the word ‘regulation’ appears 55 times and the word ‘regulatory’ appears 15 times.

Federal Court sheds light on the distinction between ‘recall to duty’ and ‘overtime’

The Federal Court has provided guidance about when recall to duty becomes ‘overtime’. Cheap health insurance victoria This is increasingly becoming an issue for employers due to flexibility in working arrangements and employees working outside of ‘normal’ hours and workplaces.

In Polan v Goulburn Valley Health (No 2) [2017] FCA 30, the Federal Court was required to determine the quantum of an employee’s underpayment of wages claim. Health insurance tax form The claim was based on the performance of on-call duties outside her ordinary hours of work between 2006 and 2012.

The Fair Work Commission has confirmed its approach to deciding whether a dismissal is a genuine redundancy within the meaning of section 389 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FWA).

In Paul Williams and Ors v Staples Pty Ltd [2017] FWC 607, four employees were reinstated when the Fair Work Commission found their dismissals were not genuine redundancies under section 389. Women’s health today The dismissals were found to be harsh, unreasonable and unjust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *